Self evaluation

overall i feel as if i could have done a much better job with my social media campaign for a few different reasons.

As a starter i have ran social media campaigns and SEO as a profession and i have a good grasp of what it actually takes to blog and cross promote, where i fell short on this campaign was that i did not have a campaign strong enough to hold my attention or enough monetary incentive to push me to promote my page daily. Being dyslexic and having ADHD makes blogging and writing one of my least favorite activities which hindered my desire to cross promote my campaign.

I feel as if i had strong original content that could make the page grow and keep a sustainable following,  Original content is one of the hardest thing to produce and although i did not post regularly all of my content was original and quality.

This semester has been crazy, finalizing a divorce taking 18 credits and studying for the LSAT has been very draining, if there is one thing  i could have changed to make this class more effective was to be able to find a social media campaign that i cared about enough to post regularly or gone out and found a client that could have paid me to manage and run their social media. Once you do something for monetary gain it is very hard to do the same task for free. i feel as if they posts that i made were quality, but the fact that they were too far spaced made the campaign ineffective. all of the key points that you taught were integrated and demonstrated through out the campaign, but i did not make the most of the opportunity

 

on shaky ground and Now what On the media

in short the only thing that i can culminate over these last two posts is something along the lines of this. On the Media, where you can find unbiased opinions about what is actually happening in the news today only to find out that we actually are liberals and only listen to the echo chamber of the left and dismiss the possibility of a trump presidency. on the reflection of "are we fair" yes i think we are fair even though we have completely dismissed the possibility of trump being president elect.

at least they have the ability to recognize that they were wrong but quickly go back to their left views by saying this isn't the actual problem its something else.

are they an actual media site? i don't feel that they will ever become transparent enough to report truth to both sides. mainly because the main media sources did not give trump a chance to even win the presidency. as long as the media is corrupt and reporting falsies then there is not a media source that can actually tell the truth, everything is an echo chamber of what is being reported.

this happened with brexit, but if you were to ask the cabbies and the bar tenders if brexit would pass, they would tell you it would. even though the media would tell you that it would never happen.

a media show should never tell you what to do next or give an opinion of how to live your life. a lot of problems in this nation are because politics have changed to who the person is rather than what the policy is.

Race bating. Original draft September 14.

there are many things that i could talk about concerning race baiting, and i feel that the country is becoming more and more divided on this subject.

Race baiting is a term for groundless accusations of racism made by liberals. It is a unique, deliberate and hypocritical focus on race in an attempt to discredit others as "racist"--a definition i found at conservapedia. Since when did this country become so quick to jump and accusations of others? I find this exact same topic and feminism, racism, and sexism. It seems that no matter what you do in conversation, if you have a different opinion of someone and their opinion might not be politically correct, I find it that the uneducated jump at the opportunity to label someone as something they're not. When did you become so acceptable to label someone as a racist?


Being born in California and living in southern Utah for most of my life, but traveling and living and very blue states for a few years on and off  I've come across a lot of different lifestyles and opinions. In the backwoods of Texas you could might find a lot of bigots who hold their values and sights dear to their heart and not willing to change. And in the heart of New York, Maine, Massachusetts, Hollywood, Austin Texas, you can find someone equally close minded on views. Not just because somebody has a bias towards a certain subject or might not even enjoy a certain race or ethnic city doesn't mean that they're going to burn a cross or demand a lynching. Is this the right way to live, no; but doesn't make them a racist? no; a bigot or a misogynist sure. 


Pointing out a problem is the step in a direction, does it help the subject? sometimes it doesn't. I'm not saying that we should dismiss problems in our nation, but it's human nature to disagree. look at the crusades from 200 A.D. all the way to the late 1600s Europe concord countries in the name of Christ killing and slaughtering millions, for what? What did the domination bring? A revolution, people seeking religious freedom, freedom from government and oppression. The exact same thing but Emperor Constantine try to establish 1400 years prior. Peace. But peace isn't brought by man verses man.

Many people have their own beliefs are they right are they wrong do they move the people along? Do you believe this brings love hope and charity? Does atheism or being agnostic do the same thing? if you do not stand for something, what do you fall for?

I have a faith in God that has brought me peace love and the desire to be a better person and to help others along the way. my way is not the only way and it should not be shoved down throats of others. if everyone stood for something that would better not only themselves but others around them race bating could disappear.

Do Better On The Media September 29 - Octoberish

in regards to "popular vote" and "Hillary destroying Trump" i don't know if i can actually agree with that statement, while Hillary was much more succinct to deliberative oratory while Donald held true to a much more businesses type of epideictic oratory, both acted like 5 year olds trying to find the next way to poke fun at each other not being able to handle a dispute without putting the other down.


the Hillary campaign continued after childishly show how much better they are than Trump, by exploiting Alicia Machado and showing how trump is racist and sexists, but frankly i could not agree more by with On The Media when they said that its embarrassing. Both Trump and Hillary hardly discussed politics but rather discussed how much better of a person they are than the other by putting the other one down. its like watching two donkeys fight over territory that neither one of them own, and at the end of the day they are still asses.



as the podcast continues they talk about inmates rights using social media, i have to stand behind Texas that prohibits inmates from using any form of social media including family members to access their social media, although i don't feel the punishment matches the crime that they are adding onto these inmates, i feel that if someone breaks the law they need to serve their time and while serving they forfeit their constitutional rights.  accessing first world pleasures such as social media should be forfeit. there should not be a first amendment rights group to advocate for felons, if they cant keep the law outside a prison is a rehabilitation center for that. now we could delve into an entire new subject about how prisons are kept and what goes on in them but that will be for another day.

although both speakers draw out good points in their views ultimately i feel as if "safe places" are in direct violation of the first amendment, only with regards of cases where students could feel as if they were in clear and probable danger should things like this exist. these "safe places" are exact opposite of what the same group of people are fighting for in our elementary schools.

The contextual effects that the speakers bring out focus mainly on social cultural and psychological aspects. mostly because this black man feels as if he were unprotected and threatened being a black man on campus and couldn't have graduated with out his "safe space"

ultimately these "safe spaces" only coddle this generation and give them more reason to be offended due to the fact we are catering to them when they become offended. when you give into a spoiled child's demands the next time they act out they will think that they will receive what they want based upon their last experience.

https://www.facebook.com/A-DSU-badly-photoshopped-Michael-Cerra-296503680718999/