although both speakers draw out good points in their views ultimately i feel as if "safe places" are in direct violation of the first amendment, only with regards of cases where students could feel as if they were in clear and probable danger should things like this exist. these "safe places" are exact opposite of what the same group of people are fighting for in our elementary schools.

The contextual effects that the speakers bring out focus mainly on social cultural and psychological aspects. mostly because this black man feels as if he were unprotected and threatened being a black man on campus and couldn't have graduated with out his "safe space"

ultimately these "safe spaces" only coddle this generation and give them more reason to be offended due to the fact we are catering to them when they become offended. when you give into a spoiled child's demands the next time they act out they will think that they will receive what they want based upon their last experience.